HomeContact Us

 

 
 
 
 

 

bulletRA Challenges

bulletOperational Areas

bulletNetwork

bulletMediation

bulletPostpaid

bulletPrepaid

bulletFraud

bulletInterconnect/ Roaming

bulletCollections/ Dunning

 

bulletGRAPA Library

 

bulletRA Standards

bulletWhitepapers

bulletWebinars

bulletBooks

 

Useful Links

bulletRA Academy Website

bulletGRAPA Website

 
Prepaid Assurance

No single technological innovation has done more for the explosion in the growth of wireless technology than prepaid. The prepaid model makes telecommunications services available to an incredibly broad range of customers that could not be serviced in the past.

The bad news is that the prepaid business model can only work using an architectural approach completely contrary to the standard telecommunications industry approach to tracking and billing revenues.

Revenue assurance for prepaid services is an incredibly challenging and profitable area for most telecoms.

There are several areas where revenue assurance can be done for prepaid services. These include:

bullet Assurance on the physical distribution of vouchers
bullet Assurance on the workings of the IN
bullet Reconciliation of MSC and IN (CDR Reconciliation)

horizontal rule

Assurance of the Physical Distribution of Vouchers

One of the most interesting and challenges things about prepaid, is the way that it changes around the entire revenue management process. With pre-paid, you have 2 additional factors, one positive and one negative.

 

On the positive side is the fact that customers pay before they use the service. This means that you have the potential for realizing the revenue sooner, and you greatly reduce the risk of not being paid.

 

On the negative side is the fact that you now how to create, purchase and manage the distribution of vouchers. Vouchers which have a value built into them and can be stolen easily.

 

Equally difficult is the fact that most telcos find that managing their own distribution channels is too expensive and limiting. This means that you have to work with retail distribution channels. Channels that might not pay you on time, thereby duplicating the cash flow risks associated with postpaid.

 

Providing assurance on the distribution and management of vouchers is a process that is best borrowed from the retail industry. Retails have been buying and distributing small items of high value for many years. Some of the techniques employed to assure this revenue stream include:

 

bullet

Voucher Tracking and Audit- many times, organizations need the help of an outsider, to simply review their voucher management operations, and determine if there is a problem or not. In order to accomplish this, the auditor needs to understand how the entire voucher management process works, and where the weaknesses and vulnerabilities in that process might be.

 

bullet

Inventory and Distribution Management Systems- these systems are created to track vouchers across their entire lifecycle, from creation, purchase, distribution until their ultimate activation by the customer. This type of inventory management can provide an incredible increase in confidence regarding voucher management, and has resulted in the identification of many leakage points for customers in the past.

horizontal rule

Assurance on the Workings of the IN

Prepaid operations create a series of special challenges for the revenue assurance analyst. One of the biggest is the fact that the "normal" post-paid CDR mediation based "check & reconciliation" process is bypassed by the intelligent network. In these cases the accounting operations are executed in real time by a system with no manual intervention possible. This means that one of the biggest jobs of the RA analyst is to make sure that this software is functioning properly.

While it is possible to perform a check of CDRs (see the reconciliation of MSC and IN section below), there are also several levels of assurance that need to be performed in order to assure the working of the IN itself.

The biggest vulnerabilities in the operation of the IN include:

bulletThe possibility of fraud (employees entering invalid vouchers, or programmatically altering voucher balances).
bulletThe possibility of programming errors that fail to accurately decrement the voucher database.

There are several ways that assurance of these areas can be accomplished. These include:

bulletVoucher Balance Reports- Voucher balance reports, are reports that take a snapshot of what the starting balances for all customers at the beginning of a specified time period (daily, weekly, or monthly), and then reports on all of the additions voucher balance that have been made, and then keeps track of the sum total of the decrements(phone calls) that were made against those balances. This kind of independent audit report can greatly reduce the chances of fraud and program error. 
bullet Customer Audit Reports- Similar to the voucher balance reports, these reports perform the same kind of reporting, but on an individual customer basis. 
bulletTest Calls- The other way that the operation of the IN can be checked is through the performance of test calls. Under this approach, particular accounts are singled out, and specific phone calls, to predetermined phone numbers, of predetermined duration are made. The voucher management database is the consulted to see if the appropriate accounting occurred within the system. 

 

 

horizontal rule

Reconciliation of MSC and IN (CDR Reconciliation)

Ultimately, the real challenge of prepaid revenue assurance is making sure that all of the calls that are completed for customers, are accurately accounted for the the IN. There is really only one way to do a comprehensive job of accomplishing this, and that is through the reconciliation of the CDRs created by the MSC and checking those against the CDRs generated by the IN.

While the job may seem difficult at first, it is requires nothing more than making some slight modifications to the way things are currently done. The steps in this process include:

bulletEstablish a mediation feed that will identify, filter and prepare all of the prepaid CDRs coming from the MSC. (This is not always easy since many network managers have disabled the generation of these CDRs at the switch in order to minimize CDR traffic.

Note:  In the cases where the network operations group will not do this on a permanent basis, it is often possible to convince them that a limited number of feeds, for a limited period of time can be done. This will create more than enough input to perform the reconciliation required. 

bulletEstablish an IN feed that will spin off CDRs from the IN itself. (as is the case with the MSC - it might not be possible to get a full time feed from this source, but a limited feed for a limited timeframe should suffice.
bulletCreate a pair of parrallelly aligned databases, one to hold IN CDRs and another to hold MSC-CDRs.
bulletCreate a serious of reconciliation reports that match up between the two sources, and identify situations where one system has transactions that the other does not.

horizontal rule

Revenue Assurance Library

bullet Revenue Assurance Case Studies
bullet Revenue Assurance White Papers
bullet Revenue Assurance Books

 

 
 
 

Copyright © 2007 [GRAPA]. All rights reserved.

Email: team@grapatel.com